

But the data says... Why making the argument isn't enough
A few weeks ago, I watched Andy Burnham’s conference speech live, and whatever your politics, it was an absolute masterclass on how to build influence. He had understood something fundamental: that there’s a difference between helping people understand your argument and encouraging people to get behind it. And as researchers I think we often miss this. We think having the evidence, the commercial rationale and a well thought out recommendation is enough. And sometimes it can


influence isn't granted, its earned
Strategic influence isn’t built through polished decks of accurate data. It’s built through having powerful conversations in the rooms that matter and with the people making the decisions. I think we intellectually know this, yet we avoid it. In this month’s newsletter I look at why, and suggest some small things to try to get started. The Paradox Of Talking to People Talking to people we don’t know well makes us want to run for the hills. Yet it is also proven to make us hap


the effort trap
For a long time, I thought leadership meant doing more. It wasn’t my conscious goal. What I thought was driving me, was something like: “Lead a team to deliver excellent work, and enjoy doing it.” But underneath that sat a belief, that to do that well, I had to do more. beliefs drive behaviour For me, this belief showed up as: Over-Servicing Over-Rescuing Overthinking Over-Managing Over-Preparing Over-Explaining These patterns served me well as a researcher: work hard, be








.png)
.png)

.png)



.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)